Wednesday, March 6, 2019

March 7 Mascot Workshop For The Electoral College Of School Boards -- Who Will Recuse?

Alleged fake Native American Mark "OneWolf" Yancey with school board member Jennifer Poirier following the Native American Guardian Association (NAGA) meeting with Skowhegan "Indian Pride" (SIP) group February 24, 2019 (photo from the SIP Facebook group)

There are several members of the school board with the last high school Native mascot in Maine who should be recusing themselves from any vote held this Thursday, March 7 at their 7pm meeting.

Top of the list is Jennifer Poirier who organizes the group Skowhegan "Indian Pride" and who convened the recent meeting with NAGA at the local bowling alley. A February screenshot from her Facebook group is evidence of her bias and why she should recuse herself according to board policy:


Apologies for the use of the R****** slur in this screenshot.


Todd Smith and Karen Smith are married and derive income from selling "Indians" sports gear at his local business, Maine Fire Equipment. They, too, should recuse themselves from a vote due to their pecuniary interest in the outcome, as noted in the guidelines provided to school boards by their law firm Drummond Woodsum.

From Todd Smith's Maine Fire Equipment website

Harold Bigelow should recuse himself because he, too, has indicated bias, and voting on the mascot would violate board policy. From the Waterville Morning Sentinel article of May 4, 2015, "SAD 54 residents argue over keeping Indian mascot for school teams":
Harold Bigelow, of Skowhegan, told the assembly of more than 60 people that there are Native Americans “who side with us” in support of keeping Skowhegan the Indians.  
“The natives today are being compensated for their past with entitlements and free education,” Bigelow said. “I personally feel they ought to focus on their own problems within, rather than creating problems for others. It is definitely not racist. Do what is right — this is our history, not theirs.”
Lynda Quinn should probably recuse herself, too, as she has been vocal in the past about her adherence to the current mascot. From the Portland Press Herald article November 12, 2017, "Mascot still in play at schools in Skowhegan":
As for the teams’ nickname, is there a chance for another vote? 
“From my perspective, no, I don’t think so – I think that was put to rest,” Quinn said. “My question is I don’t know what’s wrong with the name ‘Indian.’ It’s not making fun of anyone. It’s not disrespectful. I just don’t understand why they’re so opposed to the name ‘Indian.’ ”
Note to Ms. Quinn: why are Maine's four tribes all opposed to the name? Possibly because of tweets like this:

And from the Lewiston Sun Journal article June 17, 2018, "Skowhegan last Maine school to retain Native American Mascot":

There are 11 members left on the 23-member SAD 54 school board that voted 11-9 to keep the Indians nickname in May 2015. Of those 11 members, eight of them voted to keep the name. In district elections held on Tuesday, four incumbent school board members were re-elected, unopposed on the ballot. Two of those re-elected Tuesday — Lynda Quinn and Harold Bigelow — are staunch supporters of keeping the Indians nickname.

Aren't board members allowed to have an opinion? Of course they are and of course they will. But bias means not being open to hearing all sides of an argument and possibly changing one's mind.

Tracking any vote taken this week will be difficult. While the 2015 vote was reported as 11-9 for keeping the mascot, this is somewhat misleading. Maine Administrative School District (MSAD) 54 was created to bring several towns together for the purposes of public education.

I'm guessing there was a lot of resistance to that change, thus the weighting system in use today that renders this board about as complicated as the electoral college:


Town:                  Number of Directors:          Votes Per Director:          Total Votes Per Town:
Canaan
2
43
86
Cornville
2
30
60
Mercer
2
16
32
Norridgewock
4
46
184
Skowhegan
11
53
583
Smithfield
2
27
54

To put names to votes, here is the current board makeup following Monday's election to fill a vacant seat in Norridgewock:
DIXIE RING
Canaan  43 votes

JEAN FRANKLIN
Canaan   43 votes

THERESA HOWARD
Cornville    30 votes
DARCY SURETTE
Cornville   30 votes
MARYELLEN CHARLES
Mercer     16 votes
SARAH BUNKER
Mercer    16 votes
KATHERINE WILDER
Norridgewock   46 votes
HALEY FLEMING
Norridgewock   46 votes
DESIREE LIBBY
Norridgewock   46 votes
BRANDY MORGAN
Norridgewock  46 votes
MARK BEDARD
Skowhegan      53 votes
HAROLD BIGELOW
Skowhegan   53 votes
JEANNIE CONLEY
Skowhegan  53 votes
DEREK ELLIS
Skowhegan     53 votes
RICHARD IRWIN
Skowhegan   53 votes
PEGGY LOVEJOY
Skowhegan   53 votes
JENNIFER POIRIER
Skowhegan    53 votes
LYNDA QUINN
Skowhegan   53 votes
AMY ROUSE
Skowhegan   53 votes
KAREN SMITH
Skowhegan     53 votes
TODD SMITH
Skowhegan  53 votes
GOFF FRENCH
Smithfield     27 votes
CHRISTY JOHNSON
Smithfield    27 votes


If these look like mailing labels, it's because they are. I will have them on hand March 7 to help me accurately record what board members say during the meeting. It is described as a workshop convened so that board members may express their thoughts following lots of public comment since Penobscot Ambassador Maulian Dana delivered a letter asking to retire the mascot back in November.

Ms. Dana is currently in Washington DC meeting with officials about Penobscot Nation interests. Will she make it back to Maine in time to attend Thursday's meeting? Stay tuned.

ADDITIONAL INFO 3/7/19:
From the Portland Press Herald article of June 29, 2015,"Debate over 'Indians' mascot persists despite school board vote to keep it" (link here):


9 comments:

Anonymous said...

You need to be reminded that you do NOT set policy here in Skowhegan. This one takes the cake Lisa, I mean really!

Anonymous said...

Dear Anonymous, Thanks for reading my blog. The policies I referred to are not mine. They are policies of the MSAD 54 board regarding the appearance of bias or other conflicts of interest, or of policies suggested by the board's law firm Drummond Woodsum.

Unknown said...

No one is trying to set policy. We're merely reminding the board that it has policies, and those policies must be followed. You can find the board policies here
https://www.msad54.org/policies#section-b

MSAD/RSU54 School Board Member Code of Ethics, Part II Item C:
"…it shall be my constant endeavor to… Base my personal decision upon all available facts in each situation, to vote my honest conviction in every case, unswayed by partisan bias of any kind…"
Maine School Boards Association Handbook, Section 5, Conflicts of Interest
"…Board members must be constantly alert to their responsibilities and potential conflicts, and take care to avoid even the appearance of self-interest through disclosure or abstention (Title 30-A § 2605 )"

The legal statute Title 30-A § 2605 reads "6. Avoidance of appearance of conflict of interest. Every municipal and county official shall attempt to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest by disclosure or by abstention." http://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/30-A/title30-Asec2605.html

Anonymous said...

The irony of the anonymous commenter's comment is that Lisa is familiar enough with school board policy to know that only the board can set policy... as outlined in the board's Powers and Duties policy.

The people who seem unfamiliar with policy are the board members.

Anonymous said...

So..... anybody with a different opinion than you should recuse themselves? Anybody who votes one way or the other is bias in their opinion. The way you chose to conduct business is absurd.

Anonymous said...

Lisa have you stopped and really listened to the people that live in the communities of msad54. Have you not noticed that you have not broken our spirits. The people you are asking to recuse themselves are voting the way the folks in their communities have asked them to vote. I have seen many people from the district's show up to support keeping the name. Where are all the people who live in our district that support the change? From what I have noticed most of your support comes from out of the district. If this vote went to the people you would see the overwhelming support to keep the name. If anyone should recuse themselves it is the hired hands you all was ablecto get seated on the board

Anonymous said...

Dear Anonymous, Yes I have stopped and really listened to the people that live in the communities of MSAD 54. In fact, I have blogged about it often this school year. For example, http://went2thebridge.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-future-is-female-youthful-and.html.

Also, I have carefully watched Somerset Community TV 11's video of the public forum held in January. It is unedited and can be seen here on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2BUQWhQYu8 . I was at the public forum and listened at that time, but it was late and I was tired. So the video has helped me get clearer on what the students and athletes in your district think about the "Indian" name -- they are embarrassed by it. They think their school board can do better. As field hockey star goalie Leah Savage put it (quoting her former teacher Larry Ross), "We are missing the bus when we could have been driving it."

msm said...

Courage of convictions? Hard no follow when anonymous argues with anonymous.

Michael S. Moore, Veazie.

Diane Dicranian said...

Thanks for carefully reporting the facts Lisa. Until 2 years ago I lived in Mercer and was always embarrassed to be known as "oh the ones still called Indians, what's wrong with you people?" . To finally be free to conduct business without this racist symbol must be very freeing. Skowhegan is a great area that can finally be known for doing the right thing.

I hope our Native neighbors can forgive our lack of respect and the need to defend yourselves against something as ignorant as being referred to as someone's mascot. I'm sorry and so are many of the people I know who live in the area.