What is the weak underbelly of corporate government?

Like Al Jazeera anchor, this BBC anchor appears bewildered by information that does not fit into her frame: Darcus Howe, a West Indian Writer and Broadcaster, speaking about systematic police harassment of his grandson and other youths in England.

Great Common Dreams article from Londoner Laurie Penny had this quote in it:

In one NBC report, a young man in Tottenham was asked if rioting really achieved anything: "Yes," said the young man. "You wouldn't be talking to me now if we didn't riot, would you?"

"Two months ago we marched to Scotland Yard, more than 2,000 of us, all blacks, and it was peaceful and calm and you know what? Not a word in the press. Last night a bit of rioting and looting and look around you."

It's time to really study and promote what we know about nonviolent methods. Some of the most salient points for the times ahead:

* Nonviolent methods are not about getting attention from corporate owned media; they are about sapping a regime of its strength by not cooperating with it.

* You do not have to feel peaceful inside to successfully employ nonviolent methods.

* Nonviolent methods are effective more than twice as often as violent methods when used by groups of at least 1000 people, 46% versus 20% in research by non-pacifist Erica Chenoweth.

* Nonviolent methods do not require charismatic leaders. In fact, such leaders may be detrimental -- because if one is nabbed, the movement loses momentum.

* Albert Einstein theorized that if a tiny percent of a population stopped cooperating with authorities, a system could be brought to a standstill. Was he correct? We'll only know if we try.

There are 198 nonviolent methods listed here, everything from being your own media to occupying the streets, from supplying real needs of the masses e.g. food AND medicine, to civil disobedience. Sometimes these methods overlap, as when activists were arrested for feeding homeless people in public parks in Florida recently.

The most important point of all is that nonviolent methods are effective when used as part of an overall strategy that includes assessment of the strengths / weaknesses of one's opponents as well as the strengths / weaknesses of one's own organization -- and capitalizes (sic) on them accordingly.

This summer I asked several people what they thought the strengths and weaknesses of the corporate government system in the U.S. are. One of the most interesting weaknesses: how corporations treat our fellow animals. (Not sure of what the implications of that are for planning, but it has continued to intrigue me.)

I would love it if you would comment on this blog telling what you think some of the strengths and weaknesses of the corporate system are. Here's just a few items for my starter list:

STRENGTHS:

• owns the mass media and has them well under control
• uses air and water free of charge for profits
• able to block wishes of majority of citizens (e.g. for universal health care, to stop waging wars abroad)
• polarizes people in the U.S. via racism, constantly promoted by entertainment and "news" media
• rapidly privatizing schools, after decades of successful underfunding of public schools

WEAKNESSES:

• male dominated, lacks women's collective wisdom
• adult dominated, lacks youth & children's collective wisdom
• white dominated, lacks collective wisdom of indigenous people and other non-white groups
• cruelty to animals
• most citizens in U.S. understand that the groups controlling their government do not mean them well
• hubris and blindness to facts on the ground, characteristic of dominant groups
• assumes and depends upon continued passivity of the masses

Please add to the lists!

ADDENDUM: Just ran across this paper by researchers Ponticelli & Voth, "Austerity and Anarchy: Budget Cuts and Social Unrest in Europe, 1919-2009" reporting a high correlation between budget cuts and subsequent turmoil. Posted online a week before riots broke out in the U.K.

The Mob

source: Two Thumbs Fresh on Flickr

No, not organized crime. Disorganized crime. The real mob, the one that can rise up and sweep tyrants from their thrones.

Live coverage of the London (and Manchester, Birmingham, Bristol Liverpool, and Leeds) riots on Al Jazeera last night had anchors, reporters, and eyewitnesses alike stunned and insisting that the riots were senseless. Last fall British officials pooh-poohed the idea that cutting police might leave London vulnerable in the face of the risks of riots by disaffected, unemployed youth. "They just want to get as much as they can for free," I heard from several commentators. "There is absolutely no justification for this level of violence and this level of theft. They aren't particularly interested in justice for one man," a reference to the shooting death of 29 year old Mark Duggan as the spark that ignited the flames.

Much was made of the fact that riots were happening in "very nice" areas where you wouldn't "expect" such things to happen. Anchor Felicity Barr said again and again that the neighbors must be furious that the police are absent while youth gangs destroy things without interference. The head of Scotland Yard calmly told parents to call their children's cell phones, find out where they were, and tell them to come home. Barr noted it was young women looting as well, and several observers commented on how young the crowds appeared to be. Security expert: "Crime is all about greed -- it's not about need whatsoever."

London is a riotous old town. Remember back in December when Prince Charles and Camilla had a run in with a youthful mob during a serendipitous enounter on the way to the theater? They do, I'll wager.

The heir to the throne and his consort, the Duchess of Cornwall, react as their car is attacked by student tuition hike protesters in London. Photograph: Matt Dunham/AP

Mike Hardy, from the Institutue of Community of Cohesion, was one of the few who did not find the riots senseless. "Disassociation between the haves and the have nots...have led them to disassociate from the very values that you and I might share...disassociated and disconnected." Pressed by the  anchor to join the "senseless" consensus he admitted some of the looting and arson represented "opportunism" and added he could not condone the violence. He also spoke of "influences, I won't call them leaders" working through social media like Twitter via Blackberries.

It left me wondering if a mob is just a mob unless they are carrying signs and shouting slogans. In other words, do rampaging teens need to know their own politics in order to be politically motivated?

With the Olympics scheduled to come to town, commenters bemoaned "the PR cost to London." Like race rioters in US cities' riots in the 1960's, mobs were even attacking fire fighters when they try to put out buildings that went ablaze.

source: Nodeju.com

 One thing is fairly certain: as understaffed police let the looting continue, they planned to use London's ubiquitous video surveillance and "pick up a huge number of these young people later on at home" according to Al J's security expert.

Other views worth noting. From Twitter: grgrsmth Gregor Smith RT @broganhume: So basically the #londonriots can be boiled down to this: when you destroy peoples lives and then cut the police bad stuff happens.

"They seem to blame corporations and the old people for everything: taxes, and no opportunities "

Here's the viral video from the London neighborhood of Hackney, where a woman with a cane dares to give rioters her eloquent analysis of the stupidity of rioting without a cause. I wondered if she was aware of Fuck Cameron Suck My Dick  crudely spray painted on the wall behind her, a reference to Prime Minister David Cameron, who was rushing back from his holiday at a $10,000 a week villa in Italy.

Someone else pointed out on Twitter that the U.K.'s Muslims are pretty much off the hook for getting blamed, because after dark during the fasting month of Ramadan "we are home stuffing our faces."

By my count we now have young people with diminished economic prospects in the streets doing mass demonstrations in England, Chile, Israel, Palestine, Bahrain, Yemen, Egypt, Tunisia...etc. But it's not political. As a 20 year old her in the U.S. commented a few months ago when we were discussing the idea of Peak Oil, "So my generation is basically screwed." Maybe somebody needs to paint that on a wall in London.