Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 6, 2022

U.S. Will Now Steal Palestinian Land Also

Source: "REVEALED: Trump's 'deal of the century' map for Palestine, Israel"
Middle East Eye, January 2020

What is that "also" about? It could be read either way: 

the U.S. is now joining chief thief Israel in illegally occupying land belonging to Palestinian families in Jerusalem;

or, if you prefer, 

in addition to stealing land for military bases (e.g. Okinawa, Somalia) and oil theft (e.g. Syria, Iraq), the U.S. now plans to steal land in Jerusalem to construct an embassy.

The advent of neoliberal faker Joe Biden as POTUS has done nothing to halt U.S. enabling of Israel's violent occupation of the West Bank and bombing of blockaded Gaza. Remember when he told a roomful of oligarchs "nothing will change"? Following on the heels of the most pro-Israel president ever, Biden has in fact kept many of 45's bad policies in place. 

Building an embassy on Palestinian land in Jerusalem is the icing on the cake.

Back in July when Biden traveled to Israel (and before the election of the most right wing government in Israel's history), the White House issued the "The Jerusalem U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Joint Declaration." This document contains incendiary, even apocalyptic language: 

"unshakeable U.S. commitment to Israel’s security, and especially to the maintenance of its qualitative military edge [emphasis mine]"

"The United States further reiterates that these commitments are bipartisan and sacrosanct [emphasis mine]"




(One might wonder how a Democratic administration can pledge the support of Republicans. Or, one might have long since concluded that both the D and the R parties are wings of the same imperial government in service to corporate business interests.)

The statement also contained some astonishing hypocrisy:

"the United States and Israel affirm that among the values the countries share is an unwavering commitment to democracy, the rule of law..[emphasis mine]"

Israel is and has long been an apartheid state with full rights for its Jewish citizens -- and even its foreign settlers as long as they profess the correct religion. It detains, tortures, and executes Palestinians, including children, regularly. In May an Israeli military sniper assassinated a U.S. citizen, journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, well-known as an Al Jazeera t.v. correspondent for decades. Succumbing to pressure to investigate the murder of a U.S. citizen by a foreign military, last month the Biden administration announced the FBI will investigate the incident. Not holding their breath for that outcome, Al Jazeera Media Network has requested that the International Criminal Court investigate and prosecute those responsible.

As for the U.S. "commitment to democracy" and "the rule of law" one has only to look at its many coups toppling elected governments (e.g. Ukraine 2014, Australia 1975, Iran 1953) to bely that claim. And the destruction and looting of Iraq beginning in 2003 is emblematic of what the U.S. means when it proclaims it values the rule of law. Or maybe persecution of journalist Julian Assange would be a clearer example of how little the U.S. cares for the law?

Three paragraphs in, we get to the heart of the matter:

The United States stresses that integral to this pledge is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome. The United States further affirms the commitment to work together with other partners to confront Iran’s aggression and destabilizing activities..

The U.S. is building new nuclear weapon systems as fast as it can since the Obama administration's green light, and Israel pretends not to have nuclear weapons though everyone knows it does. But it's Iran that's the threat! 45 scuttled the U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement and Biden, despite campaign promises to restore it, is letting the JCPOA sink to the bottom of the sea.

Source: "Exclusive: Tracking the flow of stolen Syrian oil into Iraq"
The Cradle, September 2022


Iran is indeed a threat to U.S. ambitions in Syria where the theft of oil proceeds apace.

So Israel, the wealthiest of nations, receives billions from U.S. taxpayers each year as credit to buy weapons that further enrich the oligarchy that owns and operates Congress and the White House.

Stealing from Palestinians to construct an embassy in Jerusalem is arguably the least of U.S. crimes against an occupied people. By contrast, 45's closure of the U.S. Consultate General for the Palestinians in Jerusalem remains in effect.

But the land theft for an embassy is highly symbolic of the dangerous alliance between two aggressive nuclear powers. 

It's an alliance the U.S. will go to great lengths to support as the lure of cooperating with Russia beckons amid the global economic meltdown over sanctioned energy supplies and soaring prices.

Monday, July 27, 2015

Downward Spiral Of Earth's Climate Hastened By #PentagonClimateCrime


All kinds of nifty thinkers have been getting in touch with me about my #PentagonClimateCrime campaign. A sister activist in Maine sent me a handout developed for a Climate Conference last year that detailed some of the ways the Pentagon is very, very bad for the global environment.

It included points I've been laboring over recently, namely the direct contribution of carbon emissions from burning up fuel and also exploding things. But it also mentioned a couple of other key concepts to keep in mind about how our tax dollars support runaway global warming.

From Peaceworks of Greater Brunswick via Martha Spiess, looking toward the future:
The visions and plans of the Military will exacerbate climate change. 
Weather manipulation as a weapon. The High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) facility is designed to alter climate, capable of setting off earthquakes and volcanoes through electromagnetic waves. (1) 
Dominate space. The Air Force Space Command mission includes force enhancement and control of weather. (2) 
Global oil-protection service. The Carter Doctrine (1980) authorizes permanent foreign bases and the use of force for national security.  (3) 
References:
(1) Rosalie Bertell, "Planet Earth, the Latest Weapon of War", 2000
(2) Air Force Space Command, www.afspc.af.mil
(3) Michael Klare, Progressive Magazine, December 2004
 

I like having a big picture context in mind when I'm down in the trenches trying to find the elusive carbon footprint of, say, one Hellfire missile, so I especially enjoyed this timeline developed by a retired engineer who responded to my recent article in Counterpunch "Elephant In The Room: The Pentagon's Massive Carbon Footprint."

Evolving (or Devolving) Fives:

5,000,000,000 years ago --- amino acid, RNA, protein, DNA 
500,000,000 years ago --- vertebrae - chordate - pikaia
50,000,000 years ago --- primate - archicebus
5,000,000 years ago --- hominid - australopithecus
500,000 years ago --- hominin - homo rhodesiensis 
50,000 years ago --- human migration out of Africa
5,000 years ago --- civilizations, religions
500 years ago --- enclosure, colonial movements, witch burnings
50 years ago --- atom bomb (1945), GMO (1972)
5 years ago --- derivatives, surveillance state

Credit: Akio Tanaka. Used with permission.

For some reason this graphic from TheFreeThoughtProject.com that a facebook friend shared seemed to illustrate the bottom end of our devolutionary trend. The Pentagon, supposedly on our behalf, burns oil in order to fight for access to more oil so we can...burn more oil.


Tuesday, January 10, 2012

If You Believe It's China v. U.S., Which One Is The 99% ?

Corporate media outlets such as Time and the Wall St. Journal bring us news like this Tibetan nun burning herself as a protest against Chinese government policies while not bringing us news about Bradley Manning. Photo source: Guardian, "Why Tibetan Buddhists Are Burning Themselves Alive In China".
Fascinating article in my inbox this morning, especially as a follow-on to musing yesterday about whether the U.S. v. China is the false dichotomy du jour.  John Chan writing for World Socialist Web Site reported under the headline "Afghanistan signs oil contract with Chinese giant":
The US has tacitly allowed China to establish a presence in Afghanistan, largely because such investments could improve the (sic, I think he means Afghanistan's) financial self-sufficiency. At present, 90 percent of Afghan government spending depends on foreign aid. After the Aynak copper mine deal, Taliban insurgents stepped up their activities in Logar province, prompting the US to send 2,000 troops to the region.

Because of the unstable security situation, progress on Chinese investment projects has been slow over the past few years. As a result, China is completely dependent on the US and allied forces to provide protection, which could change if relations with Washington worsen.
Who's zooming whom here? I wonder how U.S. military families would feel about knowing their loved ones are risking everything, not just to "protect U.S. interests abroad," but for Chinese company profits, which similarly depend on a steady supply of fuel.


The article cited two deals, including this one, where state-sponsored energy companies in China outbid rivals from the U.S. and Canada by a mile. Sounds like long-term strategic thinking on the part of a region that has a lot of mouths to feed, and an extremely long history of top down management.
Dong Xuan, the daughter of Chinese rights activist Ni Yulan, testified on behalf of her parents [Reuters]
Don't think the 99% aren't rising up in China as they are all over the planet. News of this may be suppressed but popped up here and here recently. I've also seen references to the "Great Wall" of Internet censorship that U.S. media outlets tout, as an explanation of why we don't hear more about the economically oppressed there rattling their chains. But this, too, strikes me as an attempt to mask the fact that the Internet is heavily censored for us all.

Here's what journalist Jeffrey Kaye writing in Truthout about the Danish government's Iraq torture scandal had to say about that:
...attempts to verify details of "Iraq War Logs" information were stymied by what appears to be an Internet-wide suppression of the formerly available documents.
I have no doubt that the files still exist on many a server, and that the brainy and the brave will find ways to share them (despite brutal attacks by the U.S. government on alleged whistleblower Bradley Manning, and the banking blockade and legal harrassment of Wikileaks journalist Julian Assange). You remember the Iraq War Logs don't you? They were the trove of authentic information that contained the Collateral Murder video of soldiers in a helicopter gleefully shooting up a van full of children in Baghdad.

This sort of behavior transcends national boundaries -- though it is often fueled and enabled by racism. So does the eviction of indigenous people from ancestral lands that contain coal, oil, or potable water beneath their surface.

So before I start flag waving for my side in the big U.S. v. China game, I want to take a step back and think about headlines like Time's "The U.S. Military Eyes the Asia-Pacific, and China Shrugs?" this way: What would the 1% do?

    
Sichuan striking workers and riot police. Source: Weibo.com
Occupy Oakland police presence. Source: Politico