Showing posts with label #climatecatastrophe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #climatecatastrophe. Show all posts

Saturday, August 27, 2022

Divide & Conquer, Part 2: Boomers v. The Youngs

What was then called the Generation Gap was a feature of my own youth. Was it driven by mainstream media? Hard to say for certain, but we experienced it viscerally as a culture gap with our WW2 or Korean war veteran fathers and our housewife mothers. The draft that condemned 58,000 young men to die and thousands more to suffer a lifetime of moral injury over terrorizing and slaughtering millions in Vietnam drove the disconnect between our generation and theirs. This spilled over into negative attitudes toward "the Establishment" in general and the government in particular (which attitudes, incidentally, eliminated the viability of the draft in the U.S.).

Today's Boomer v. Zoomer, or Millennial, or Gen X, is a different divide. Mostly, it's economic.

For example, a poverty draft is what replaced the "universal" draft, and the desire to pay for a college education is a very common reason young people give for enlisting in the military today.

 

The boomers who tuned in, turned on, and dropped out often did so cushioned by family money. I'll always be grateful to an artist friend who heard my millennial teenager say he wanted to live like the artists who moved to the country and spent all day in their studios. Friend to my son: "We had trust funds."

Other boomers invented the derivatives they used to get rich while crashing the housing market in 2008. Some become obscenely wealthy investing in information technology that drove the boom that preceded the bust. 



Boomers got college educations with loans we could easily pay off, we bought houses with incomes from full time jobs with lavish perks and benefits, and younger generations got the crumbs of that. They are often disparaged by oldsters because they evince no loyalty to the corporations who exploit them and toss them aside. Retiring after decades of service with a comfortable pension is rare nowadays outside the upper echelons of management.

Most working families today have two full time jobs, astronomic child care costs, and a rent or mortgage payment that is staggering. Add health care that is unaffordably out of reach for many youngs, plus a climate emergency rampaging out of control, and its easy to see why respecting their elders is not in the cards for young people today.

Today, boomers are generally considered to be more racist, more selfish, and ruder than everyone else. 

Some of this is undoubtedly true, while some of it is perception. I remember a family dinner where the millennials were unpacking #MeToo and one of the males opined that it was payback for boomers being dicks and proud of it. His wife responded, "You think I've never been sexually harrassed by someone our age?"

How much generational conflict is driven by mass media in 2022? Quite a lot. Type in the search term "boomers v." and get 15 million hits.

The oligarchs who own and operate corporate media would far rather have young people resenting the boomers as a group than eating the specifically rich ones. 

Did I mention that slogans like "eat the rich," and images like guillotines, are common in spaces where younger people congregate?


A very interesting generational divide has been the steady movement away from binary gender identification. My grandmother bemoaned the fact that hippy long hairs made it so her generation couldn't tell the boys from the girls (really? I could). Now, boomers crack jokes like the one above. But younger generations are on to something: the need to reject the mind control of false dichotomies that begin at birth with gender assignment.

Ultimately, the U.S. war of generations reflects the absurd situation families are in: it takes a village to raise a child, and the nuclear family is no substitute. After covid took an ax to already inadequate child care structures, working mothers especially are struggling.


Who can blame them if many don't want to have children at all?

Boomers, that's who.











Thursday, August 4, 2022

End Pentagon Climate Crimes! Say Veterans Arrested In DC


Before deciding to reduce my own emissions by taking action closer to home, I used to join Veterans for Peace members risking arrest in Washington DC to protest U.S. wars. VFP members' motivation this week was an issue I've been focused on for years, and one that is finally getting some traction in the corporate press: the
climate impact of the U.S. military. So I'm a bit sad that I wasn't there with them.

I appreciate this group's efforts to get our warmongering government to recognize that we're in a climate emergency and act accordingly. VFP members also called attention to other dangerous enivronmental impacts of military pollution, from toxic burn pits to leaking jet fuel into the groundwater in Hawai'i.

Here's the press release from their action in DC.


Military Veterans Arrested Demanding Presidential & Congressional Action on Climate Crisis

 

WASHINGTON, D.C.- On Wednesday, August 3rd, seven military veterans and supporters were arrested near the U.S. Capitol Building. Members of Veterans For Peace, an organization of over 120 military veteran chapters worldwide, gathered at the foot of the Capitol demanding more robust action on addressing the climate crisis.


Veterans For Peace demands that the President and Congress:

  • Stop the U.S.-driven wars and all military weapons sales, shipments and support to nation states engaged in open armed conflict.

  • Require the U.S. military release a full report on their greenhouse gas emissions. The United States military does not publicly and regularly report its overall fuel consumption or greenhouse gas emissions—despite requirements laid out in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2021. DoD is estimated to emit more CO2 than over 120 separate countries.

  • Declare a Climate Emergency NOW–and use all the resulting Presidential powers including stopping the granting of new resource extraction permits and leases, e.g., drilling on public lands and pipeline construction, and strengthening of standards including air quality and methane emissions.

  • Cut the Pentagon Budget- Military spending should be reduced by at least $200 billion annually, freeing up $2 trillion or more over the next decade for domestic and human needs priorities. With those spending cuts, the Pentagon's budget would remain more than enough to keep America safe at a level well above our nation's post-World War II historical average.

  • Prioritize investing in communities in the U.S. impacted by the military and climate change and in the Global South including paying the U.S.' climate debt.

  • Prioritize diplomacy over the threat of military force, beginning with negotiations for a global Climate Emergency Treaty and the renegotiation of lapsed nuclear arms treaties between U.S. and Russia.

"The military has done next to nothing to reduce their carbon footprint, either ignoring the climate mandate completely or just focusing on creating more advanced weapons systems that can continue to operate under worsening climate conditions. From the burn pits to nuclear waste to water contamination in Hawai'i, the U.S. military is responsible for an unprecedented amount of climate disasters. It is past time for Congress and the President to hold the U.S. military accountable for their catastrophic effects on the planet." -Garett Reppenhagen, Executive Director of Veterans For Peace, U.S. Army, Cavalry/Scout Sniper, OIF Veteran.

"I chose to risk arrest today because as a Marine who served in Afghanistan and Iraq, I saw firsthand the devastation that the military has wrought on countries around the globe, including just 48 hours ago when the U.S. military issued yet another drone strike on Afghanistan. The U.S. spends unprecedented amounts of money on an ever-expanding U.S. military, using veterans like me as pawns in their justifications for more money. We need to be reducing U.S. militarism and redirecting that money towards climate solutions like renewable energy and resources that meet human needs." -Chris Velazquez, OIF/OEF Veteran, 2004-2010

Interviews available upon request

####

 For Photos of the Event


"As a retired research geologist I fear the climate crisis. As a veteran, I know our military fuels this crisis and they have no accountability for their actions. It is too late for more talk, we need immediate action." -Jim Rine, U.S. Army, 1970-73

"As a lifelong resident of Hampton Roads, Virginia, which has the largest naval institution in the world, I've seen the domestic environmental harm the military causes in my own backyard. From the dumping of jet fuel into wetlands in Virginia Beach to the contamination of our waterways from shipyards, it's important to recognize all impacts of incessant militarism and say no to the military's war on the climate." T.J. Thompson, U.S. Navy, 1998-2004, deployed to South America, Mediterranean Cruise and the invasion of Iraq

"It is totally irresponsible for our government to spend billions of dollars funding wars abroad that accelerate the climate crisis while people are suffering at home without housing or food." -Jeff Parente, U.S. Marine Corps, 2006-2014, OIF Veteran

"The money needed to avoid the worst results of climate change, as well as many other social issues that lack adequate funding, is the wasteful and bloated military budget. Not only that, the U.S. military is the greatest contributor to mounting ecological catastrophe." -Joshua Farris, U.S. Army, 2000-2004, OIF veteran

"We've passed the point of return for our climate and our world. I am here because I know that we must do everything we can to mitigate the worst of what is to come. We must not sit back in apathy and hopelessness. The time to act is NOW." -Stephanie Atkinson, U.S. Army Reserve, 1984-1990

"As a veteran I have seen first hand the waste of the U.S. military. I have also watched Congress say that they care about veterans and active duty members of the military as an excuse to enrich lobbyists and military contractors, while defunding any military benefits. Since leaving the military I have become a land conservation advocate and I believe I have a responsibility to speak out against U.S. militarism and the pollution that the military creates." -Mike Marion, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1988-90, Panama

"One of the ways I atone for my actions when I was in the military in Iraq, before I knew any better, was to work towards a better world.  I want future generations to have a chance to live in a world that is not on fire."  -Jules Vaquera, U.S. Air Force, OIF Veteran, 2000-2006

Contact: 314-899-4515, press@veteransforpeace.org

##



Check out VFP's Climate and Militarism Project which is doing great work educating and resisting. 

Thursday, July 21, 2022

Reporting On Military's Role In Driving Climate Crisis Too Negative For Corporate Media?

"Horrific heat descends upon Western Europe:  104° in London"
 Source: Yale Climate Connections (Image credit: tropicaltidbits.com)


Source: India Today

Following an extensive clampdown on information sharing --using the pretext of dangerous wronthink on the covid pandemic -- no corporate media outlets and few social media posts in 2022 are in danger of connecting these dots: 




Despite years of research and reporting on the U.S. military's enormous role in driving climate crisis, and despite record high temperatures and wildfires across the Global North, what messages are corporate media putting out?

Fear Russia and send more weapons to Ukraine. 


By astonishing coincidence, the popular Netflix horror series Stranger Things began production in 2016 and just happens to be set in the 1980's, getting maximum mileage out of Cold War era bad guys.

Fear China, and conduct RIMPAC war games with South Korea and Japan blowing up battleships in the Pacific.  Also, focus on Taiwan as the location for the next U.S./NATO proxy war.

Remind people how beastly hot it is and how many unnecessary deaths result -- but do not address the root cause: fighting wars for access to fossil fuels.

Admonish climatologists to not be so negative.

https://twitter.com/benphillips76/status/1549768004233314306

Spin "protecting the homeland and the United States" (whatever that's supposed to mean) as necessary because Russia and China might get better access to fossil fuel reserves, rare earth minerals, and potable water in Latin America.

https://twitter.com/KawsachunNews/status/1549834456353185797

Promote WWIII, ignoring the abundance of historical examples of what happened to empires that overextended in the mistaken belief that they were invincible.

Fiddle while Rome burns.

Image courtesy of ARRT! (Artists’ Rapid Response Team) arrteam.org


Monday, April 25, 2022

Setting Ourselves On Fire



I've lived my entire life with the spectre of thermonuclear fire consuming the world. It hovered over us as we contemplated the future of what we'd started in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and, sometimes, joked about it -- dark humor, laughing in the face of annihilation. 

When I say my entire life, I'm not exaggerating. My father was in college when I was born and he had a post-nuclear apocalypse poem published in a UMaine literary journal. My parents also had vinyl of the Kingston Trio playing "The Merry Minuet" at iconic NYC nightclub the hungry i. (With apologies for the typical white supremacist perspective that the continent of Africa is  analogous to nation-states.)
...Italians hate Yugoslavs. South Africans hate the Dutch.
And I don't like anybody very much!
But we can be tranquil and thankful and proud
For man's been endowed with a mushroom shaped cloud.
And we know for certain that some lovely day
Someone will set the spark off and we will all be blown away.
They're rioting in Africa. There's strife in Iran.
What nature doesn't do to us will be done by our fellow man.
After listening to that on repeat for several years, is it any wonder I flinched every time a plane flew overhead? Such was my childhood. 

Then there were the racial assassinations of the 60's. James Baldwin's prophetic book The Fire Next Time was on our shelves. It's a metaphor, it's Biblical, and it also coexisted with the arson that accompanied many riots. Cue Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. whose famous quote on that deserves its full context:

And I would be the first to say that I am still committed to militant, powerful, massive, non­-violence as the most potent weapon in grappling with the problem from a direct action point of view. I'm absolutely convinced that a riot merely intensifies the fears of the white community while relieving the guilt. And I feel that we must always work with an effective, powerful weapon and method that brings about tangible results. But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the plight of the negro poor has worsened over the last twelve or fifteen years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity. [emphasis mine]

(Do I need to point out how much worse things have gotten for Black people in incarceration nation since MLK said that?)

So I've worried about inequality and injustice, and I've worried about U.S. wars with their destruction and self-inflicted moral injuries. 

Photo by Malcolm Browne for Associated Press

Back when the corporate press showed more of the news, we watched as a Buddhist monk in Vietnam died by self-immolation. Widely perceived as a protest against the war,  
Thích Quang Duc's act called attention to persecution of Buddhists by the puppet government of South Vietnam in 1963.

Many years and many U.S. puppet governments later, it slowly became apparent that we should all be more aware of global warming and climate change ending us. And that wars and, more broadly, militarism are a big part of that.



A long preamble leading up to this news: 

a Buddhist burned himself to death in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on Earth Day 2022 to call attention to extreme climate crisis.


This image from an unknown videographer appears to be a still from a video allegedly of Wynn Bruce's self-immolation, and an emergency responder trying to put the fire out.

But under the 21st century's corporate information control regime, hardly anybody heard about it.

Image source: UK Daily Mail "Pictured: Climate activist, 50, who died after lighting himself ablaze in front of the Supreme Court on Earth Day wrote '4/22/2022' and a fire emoji in a Facebook post from 2020"

In fact the first few stories about Bruce's act in the U.S. corporate press neglected to include...climate change. This is consistent with their focus on profits over life and is a major contributing factor to the increased threat of climate chaos.

The same is true of their chronic neglect of the military elephant in the climate change room. To know the facts about that, you'd need to turn to alternative media, or search out collections like this one.

Nonstop coverage of atrocities allegedly committed on behalf of the villain du jour pushes out useful, actionable information.

Today, as the world gallops toward nuclear confrontation in the proxy war between the U.S./NATO and Russia, U.S. taxpayers recently sent $1 billion in weapons to Ukraine's puppet government while the corporate press applauded and ice shelves collapsed.

Leading intellectuals wonder not if but how we will set ourselves on fire unto death. Will it be long painful years of heat, floods, drought, and sea level rise? Or a relatively brief nuclear war being inexplicably promoted by the talking heads employed to manufacture consent? Stay tuned.

Monday, January 10, 2022

New Video By Military Emissions Researchers Reveals Truth About What's Driving #ClimateCrisis


Excited to share this newly published short video introducing many people to facts that have been hidden for far too long: 

the world's militaries, especially the U.S. military, are major contributors to climate crisis.

Climate change and the military: tracking their carbon emissions features researchers from the U.S. and UK discussing what they have found and also how difficult it was to find this information. (My note: by design.)

Why not share this video with your elected officials, friends, and family?

Thursday, September 2, 2021

Blue Angels Not Green: Air Shows Harm Climate


As we prepare to protest the Navy's Blue Angels pollution extravaganza at the Great Maine Air Show in Brunswick this Saturday, September 4 at 10am, I had occasion for a walk down memory lane. 

In 2012, we were at the same air show protesting the Air Force Thunderbirds.

We marched from the Bowdoin College campus out to the main gate of the Brunswick Naval Air Station (now Brunswick Landing).

Selma Sternlieb (6th row) Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

 Bob Dale (with sign) Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

These photos are especially poignant as a number of our peace loving stalwarts have left us in the interim. Selma Sternlieb, Bob Dale, Peter Woodruff, présente.

Peter Woodruff Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

Marchers carried a banner remembering the late Tom Sturtevant, a Veterans for Peace organizer who concentrated on countering military recruiting efforts at high schools around the state (air shows are primarily recruitment events). 

Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

I can't find my photo of Tom at an air show protest prior to 2012 but I do remember he carried a sign that said: 

BLUE ANGELS ARE NOT GREEN.

I had fun seeing many familiar faces including a couple who can't be with us this year like former Bowdoin student Kong Phui Yi and good friend Karen Wainberg. 


Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

If you're around this weekend, I hope you will join us. 

Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi



Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi

Photo credit: Roger Leisner, Maine Paparazzi


If you're on Facebook, you can rsvp here.

Wednesday, August 11, 2021

Pentagon Cares About Climate Change, For All The Wrong Reasons

There is so much to unpack in this boneheaded article from online rag Defense One that it's hard to know where to begin: "Climate Change Is Already Disrupting the Military. It Will Get Worse, Officials Say."

The good news: the Pentagon has noticed that climate change is a thing

The bad news: the Pentagon is taking minimal responsibility for contributing to it, instead mostly just planning for how to mitigate changes that will be forced upon them. 

The good news: they're planning for changes like providing more help to fight forest fires.

The bad news: they're planning for providing more storm troopers to beat up, tear gas, pepper spray, and LRAD protesters when militarized police forces in U.S. cities want more boots on the ground. 

Pentagon brass quoted in the article also see this as bad news, but for a different reason: soldiers "aren't doing the sort of warfighter training that they need to do."

Police wearing riot gear try to disperse a crowd Monday, Aug. 11, 2014, in Ferguson, Mo. You know, a crowd protesting that unarmed teenafer Michael Brown had been gunned down by police and left to die in the street. Source: Business Insider, AP Photo / Jeff Roberson

Really? It seems like urban warfare against people defending their right to life in their own neighborhoods will be one of the few things left for human warfighters to do in the 21st century. It won't take that many of them to press the buttons activating killer robots in the air, on land, or sea.

One of the hallmarks of what is passed off as journalism under late stage capitalism is claiming to ask hard questions while actually producing a puff piece.

(A sampling of the featured articles in this issue can be seen above.) Producing "analysis" that is devoid of context is a specialty, as is presenting as fait accompli various ghastly decisions and programs that are highly profitable to the already wealthy (e.g. missile "defense").

In its publisher's own words: "Defense One is a portfolio brand of GovExec, whose market-leading services help contractors support government leaders and their missions."

For "missions" here read "quest to land a lucrative position following time spent posing as a government leader."

So, absent a rigorous examination of how the Pentagon and its contractors are actually driving climate crisis, we're invited to view the problem from the "defense" perspective.

For example:

In June, the International Military Council on Climate and Security released its second report on the impacts of climate change on issues such as governance and civil unrest across the globe. They surveyed experts from a variety of institutions...asking them how they expect various risk areas like biodiversity, water availability, and instability within nations to evolve over the next decade. The experts held a dim view.  

"Respondents expect a majority of risks will pose high to catastrophic levels of risk to security. [emphasis mine] Ten and 20 years from now, respondents expect very high levels of risk along nearly every type of climate security phenomena,” the report said.  

The experts concluded that the global governance system isn’t prepared for many of the risks. So, in part because of that lack of preparedness, more and more of the international response to climate-change-related issues will fall to men and women in uniform. [emphasis mine]

You can almost hear contractors like Microsoft and their top brass clients salivating over this prospect, can't you? 

But not to worry. Technology will save the day! (Budgets go ka-ching.)

Unless it doesn't.

The article ends on what I considered to be a hopeful note:

"...you’re making a decision based on the probability of occurrence, and that’s what you’re putting in. But what if you get it wrong? And what if you get it wrong with something that’s mission-critical?”

Mission-critical like crashing human life on this planet because you ignored the 100% probability that failing to count military emissions leads directly there? 


link to petition site

To: Participants in COP26 UN Climate Change Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, November 1-12, 2021

As a result of final-hour demands made by the U.S. government during negotiation of the 1997 Kyoto treaty, military greenhouse gas emissions were exempted from climate negotiations. That tradition has continued.

The 2015 Paris Agreement left cutting military greenhouse gas emissions to the discretion of individual nations.

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, obliges signatories to publish annual greenhouse gas emissions, but military emissions reporting is voluntary and often not included.

NATO has acknowledged the problem but not created any specific requirements to address it.

There is no reasonable basis for this gaping loophole. War and war preparations are major greenhouse gas emitters. All greenhouse gas emissions need to be included in mandatory greenhouse gas emission reduction standards. There must be no more exception for military pollution.

We ask COP26 to set strict greenhouse gas emissions limits that make no exception for militarism, include transparent reporting requirements and independent verification, and do not rely on schemes to "offset" emissions. Greenhouse gas emissions from a country’s overseas military bases must be fully reported and charged to that country, not the country where the base is located.

Friday, June 25, 2021

Planet Burning, Lawsuits Churning, Pentagon Still Turning Toward Climate Destruction


It's another record breaking hot season for the Northern Hemisphere. Despite the fact that the summer solstice just occurred we're seeing Arctic ground temperatures in the 110+ degrees Farenheit range (38+ Celcius), a 1,200 year drought shaping up in the western United States, and spring wildfires in Siberia, Arizona, and New Mexico. Some of these are believed to be "zombie fires" that wintered over under the snow cover in the Arctic, unextinguished.

The lawsuit by young people suing the federal government for inaction on climate, thus depriving them of their constitutional right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," is on appeal with a hearing set for today at 1pm EDT to review oral arguments in Juliana v. United States.

Meanwhile, the state of Massachusetts has seen progress in its lawsuit against petroleum giant Exxon Mobil for knowing the risks of climate crisis yet concealing them from consumers and the general public.



"Greenwashing" similar to that currently engaged in by Hydro-Quebec on behalf of what some in Maine are calling the "Massachusetts extension cord" project currently destroying acres of carbon-sequestering trees to build a giant transmission line. Governor Janet Mills just vetoed a bill to ban foreign entities like HQ and the owner of the line, Iberdrola, from spending on lobbying and advertising campaigns to influence the outcome of citizen referendums; one on the ballot in November threatens the project.

I'm sure investment bankers at Goldman Sachs have made it crystal clear to Mills which side her bread is buttered on.


Source: Brown University, Watson Institute, Costs of War Project

Meanwhile, the biggest polluter on the planet continues largely unchallenged.

In September, Maine will be visited by the super polluting and entirely unnecessary Blue Angels airshow. All these carbon emissions kill only indirectly i.e. these planes don't drop bombs on anyone, and they drop napalm onto the runway in Brunswick only to "entertain." 



Of course all airshows, like the military displays at sporting events that your tax dollars subsidize, are recruiting tools. Along with crushing student debt for postsecondary education, they steer the young people not born to affluence into donning uniform in order to qualify for "free" college.

Why don't the big environmental groups challenge the Pentagon on its non-stop hastening of climate crisis?

Some say its because most of them take money from the corporate owned and operated Democratic Party. Some say its because they dare not appear "unpatriotic" even if that's what it will take to keep Earth liveable for our grandchildren. Some want to stay in their silo of challenging climate crisis without venturing into the much more fraught arena of challenging our militarized, fascistic government that exists mainly to protect the profits of already wealthy corporations.


If embedded video of Veterans for Peace plenary session on the U.S. Military & Climate does not play for you, access it here: https://youtu.be/M_unc1AFbkw

Some say that an annual budget of $778 billion buys a lot of silence from potential opponents.

I notice that in the new guidelines the Biden administration is developing anyone who opposes the life-threatening system of capitalism will now be designated a terrorist.

Sign me up!


Thursday, April 1, 2021

Guard Against The Greed And Ignorance Driving Climate Crisis


Research in the UK turns up the unsurprising fact that a tiny group of humans cause the lion's share of air
pollution via air travel. I'm old enough to remember when the fawning press called these elites "the jet set" due to their excessive use of machines that allow for swift travel. 

The wealthy use travel to show off their privilege. For example, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz flying to Cancun during a statewide power outage last winter in Texas. 

Or, in an anecdote I was told by an Afghan friend, a bride in Kabul flying to Dubai for her wedding makeup.

Of the two examples, one was the direct result of unprecedented freezing weather crashing a U.S. state's (unregulated) power grid. 

Thus, climate change begets climate change.

Then there's greedy capitalist Elon Musk's SpaceX flops that belch carbon and other greenhouse gases to exalt his ego if not to consolidate his wealth.

My friend and neighbor Barry Dana, past chief of the Penobscot Nation, has been ringing the alarm bell about air travel for years. His response to my sharing the news that a handful of people cause most of the climate damage due to aviation was, "I see flying to be one thing we have in our daily choices that we have the power NOT to do." He is critical of Native environmental activists who fly in indigenous experts from around the globe to confer about our climate problem.

My response is to listen to Barry, an educator for traditional wisdom about how to live sustainably on this planet, and to make my choices accordingly.

But the elephant in the climate change room is actually military aviation.

Neoliberal rag The Guardian naturally did not offer this context in their article about elite air travel.


Source: Brown University, Watson Institute, Costs of War Project

Luckily for us, academics have been studying military contributions to climate crisis for a while now. I've been collecting their reports here for a few years and was excited to learn that peace activist emeritus Kathy Kelly referred to my collection in an interview recently. Podcaster Kollibri terre Sonnenblume characterized this as:

"most US Americans are ignorant of the consequences of US militarism." 

No kidding.

Like The Guardian, the corporate press here in the U.S. works overtime to ignore the real drivers of climate change. To help craft this false narrative, military emissions were exempt from being quantified in the Kyoto climate protocols, and were made optional in the Paris climate accords. Because our planet's atmosphere isn't affected by pollution if it has the right flag on it?

Now, with a former Raytheon board member heading the Pentagon, this problem is unlikely to be addressed. The U.S. military is well aware that climate change is a thing and they have lots of contingency plans for dealing with the coastal flooding of many of their 800 bases around the planet.

I founded the Maine Natural Guard to help people connect the dots between climate crisis and U.S. taxpayer funded military aviation. So few people seem to care that we bomb civilians constantly no matter which of the two corporate parties is in power at the moment, but many do care about the existential threat of climate emergency. 

I'm glad to see Veterans for Peace has a web page for their Working Group on Climate Crisis and Militarism with their #1 focus: "The unequal burden of both climate change and militarism on people of color and the poor." 

This point is important to bear in mind as we witness the ramp up to war with China, Russia, or (are the generals insane?) both. When I read Ann Wright's comprehensive review "In Alarmist Turn, NATO Is Increasingly Positioning Itself In Opposition To China, I saw our carbon bootprint spreading like the stain it is.

Want to be part of the solution?

Add your name to join the Natural Guard effort from wherever you are!



I pledge to speak out about the effects of militarism on our environment, because the commons we all share that sustain life are valuable to me.

In discussions about security and safety, I will remind others of the need to count in the cost in pollution and fuel consumption of waging wars all around the planet.

In discussions about acting soon to protect our loved ones from the effects of climate chaos, I will remind others of the need to examine the role of the Pentagon and its many contractors in contributing to planetary warming.