Contact: Koohan Paik
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
WORLD’S
LARGEST ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION IN
ETHICAL
QUANDARY:
Should
it answer to conference sponsors Samsung and
Korean government,
or
to its
historical mission to protect environment
and social justice?
JEJU ISLAND, SOUTH KOREA – September 14 - The
world’s largest and oldest conservation
organization, the International Union for
Conservation of Nature, is holding its giant
quadrennial convention on Jeju Island, South
Korea. But what conference planners weren’t
expecting was massive protests from the local
community, joined by international activists,
against a gigantic navy base being built seven
kilometers away. As a result of this controversy,
an emergency motion to stop base construction has
been drafted, which will be voted on tomorrow,
Saturday, September 15.
The South Korean government, which is
subordinate on military matters to the U.S., under
the US-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty, is building the
enormous base on the coast at Gangjeong, a
traditional farming and fishing community. If the
project is allowed to continue, it will be large
enough to hold 20 warships, including Aegis
destroyers, aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines
and 8,000 troops. South Korea is already one of
the most militarized places in the world. But this
new base is part of the Pentagon’s recently
announced plan to move 60 percent of its military
resources from Europe and the Middle East to the
Asia-Pacific region – the “Pacific pivot.” The
idea is to circle China with Aegis missiles.
Islanders fear the base would destabilize the
region, lead to a new Cold War, and turn their
home into a first-strike target.
A recently leaked communiqué, obtained by a
Korea National Assembly member, reveals the close
connection between the Pentagon and base
construction. The communiqué, sent by the
commander of the US Naval Forces, Korea, to the
South Korean defense minister, directly requests
that the base plan be designed to accommodate an
American nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.
The base would also destroy local
livelihoods, biodiverse habitats in land and sea,
contaminate one of the cleanest and most abundant
freshwater sources in the world, kill the planet’s
largest temperate soft-coral habitat (15 acres),
contaminate the rich volcanic soil in nearby farms
as well as nearby UNESCO World Heritage Sites and
a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Korea’s last 100
dolphins which frequent Gangjeong would also
suffer. The villagers have been protesting for
over five years, facing arrest, imprisonment
without habeus corpus, and daily police
brutality.
On May 30, 2012, three UN Special Rapporteurs
sent a joint allegation letter to the South Korean
government regarding numerous “acts of harassment,
intimidation and ill-treatment of peaceful
protestors in Gangjeong village,” requesting a
response within 60 days. That was three and a half
months ago, but the Korean government has yet to
respond.
An American scientist, Dr. Imok Cha, was
deported upon arrival at the airport on the first
day of the conference, where she was expected to
give presentations on an independent environmental
assessment that exposed the flaws in the Korean
government’s Environmental Impact Assessment for
the base construction.
Leadership at the IUCN conference have
refused to give the Gangjeong villagers their own
exhibition booth to expose the litany
Korean-government violations, offering no
explanation. On the last day of his tenure as
president of IUCN, Ashok Khosla denounced
the campaign to save Gangjeong Village from base
construction, calling the movement “colonial”
because non-Koreans were involved. However,
attendees know the reason that IUCN officials have
done their best to silence the Gangjeong
villagers: the main sponsors of their conference
in Jeju are the Korean government ($20 million)
and Samsung Corporation, which is also the lead
contractor of base construction. Soon after
Khosla issued his “colonialism” charges, a group
of South Koreans representing 189 South Korean
organizations, denounced Khosla, and charged him
with ignoring their clearly expressed opposition
to the base that had been going on for over five
years.
As a result, a massive division within the
formidable organization has been cleaved between
its Secretariat and the 8,000 members in
attendance who object to leadership’s decision to
side with it sponsors. One organization, the
Center for Humans and Nature, from Indiana in the
U.S., has drafted an emergency resolution to stop
the construction. It will be on the Assembly floor
for a vote before international governments and
NGOs, this Saturday (Korea time), the last day of
the conference.
Many members feel the entire future and
credibility of the 64-year-old conservation
institution is at stake, if politics prevent the
resolution from passing.
##